<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Insulin Resistance, Diabetes, and the Metabolic Vicious Cycle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drcate.com/diabetes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drcate.com/diabetes/</link>
	<description>Good Health, It&#039;s Only Natural</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:21:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mateja</title>
		<link>http://drcate.com/diabetes/comment-page-1/#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>Mateja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drcate.com/?p=126#comment-914</guid>
		<description>Dear dr. Cate,

thank you for answering :)

best regards,
mateja</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear dr. Cate,</p>
<p>thank you for answering <img src='http://drcate.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>best regards,<br />
mateja</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catey</title>
		<link>http://drcate.com/diabetes/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Catey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drcate.com/?p=126#comment-911</guid>
		<description>Mateja

Thank you for raising this important point. Yes, juicing green veggies is a perfectly good way to release nutrients, including the (usually small amounts of) glucose/fructose. When the nutrition tables are created, the lab workers homogenize the raw veggies in a blender in order to analyze their contents so that when you look up how much sugar is in, say, beet greens or a carrot, that&#039;s based on a &quot;juiced&quot; product anyway. In people with inefficient digestive systems, the sugar and nutrient benefits of raw veggies will be somewhat reduced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mateja</p>
<p>Thank you for raising this important point. Yes, juicing green veggies is a perfectly good way to release nutrients, including the (usually small amounts of) glucose/fructose. When the nutrition tables are created, the lab workers homogenize the raw veggies in a blender in order to analyze their contents so that when you look up how much sugar is in, say, beet greens or a carrot, that&#8217;s based on a &#8220;juiced&#8221; product anyway. In people with inefficient digestive systems, the sugar and nutrient benefits of raw veggies will be somewhat reduced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mateja</title>
		<link>http://drcate.com/diabetes/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Mateja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drcate.com/?p=126#comment-908</guid>
		<description>Dear dr. Cate,

I am just reading your book Deep nutrition and loving it. I do have one question: is it OK to JUICE green leafy vegetables and grasses?

I am asking because of the pharagraph saying that glucose is trapped inside cellulose. As juicing breaks up the plant&#039;s cells and cellulose, would that mean that by juicing green leafy vegetables I would actually be getting an extra dose of glucose? And if yes, is that amount of glucose big enough to counter-weight the benefits of juicing?

Thank you.

best regards,
mateja</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear dr. Cate,</p>
<p>I am just reading your book Deep nutrition and loving it. I do have one question: is it OK to JUICE green leafy vegetables and grasses?</p>
<p>I am asking because of the pharagraph saying that glucose is trapped inside cellulose. As juicing breaks up the plant&#8217;s cells and cellulose, would that mean that by juicing green leafy vegetables I would actually be getting an extra dose of glucose? And if yes, is that amount of glucose big enough to counter-weight the benefits of juicing?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p>best regards,<br />
mateja</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://drcate.com/diabetes/comment-page-1/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 02:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drcate.com/?p=126#comment-890</guid>
		<description>Thank you Dr. Cate for breaking down the study and it&#039;s claims for me as you have a great way of explaining things. I knew you could make sense of it for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Dr. Cate for breaking down the study and it&#8217;s claims for me as you have a great way of explaining things. I knew you could make sense of it for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catey</title>
		<link>http://drcate.com/diabetes/comment-page-1/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>Catey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drcate.com/?p=126#comment-887</guid>
		<description>This is an association study, which is the same kind of study Ancel Keys used to convince trusting physicians and millions of Americans that animal fats clogged our arteries. Association (also called correlation) studies must always be interpreted with extreme caution. As Uffe Ravnskoff points out in his book The Cholesterol Myth, correlation does not imply causation and he shows graphs of the correlations between TV ownership and the rates of death from heart attack. Do TV sets cause heart attacks? Unlikely, unless you watch too many Daily Show reruns. More likely people who don&#039;t own TVs are more active, healthier, and therefore less likely to get heart attacks and this creates a correlation without causation.

The bovine genetics and casein subtypes in the different breeds also co-exists with numerous other differences. We know the Holsteins are the breed of choice for industrial farmers because they produce more milk, though of lower quality, and these animals tend to be grain fed rather than grass fed and raised in deplorabile conditions, injected with hormones, and on and on. 

A more likely causative explanation is the fact that A1 casein types are consumed primarily by Americans and A2 primarily by people living in countries with lower rates of autism.

I also did look at the genetics, and the difference results in a casein protein that is nearly identical except for a shift in a single amino acid, if memory serves, which is probably a natural variation. Goat milk protein differs by more than a single amino acid, soit seems to me it makes little intuitive sense to start blaming this kind of natural variation for an epidemic. 

And a final point: If A1 were the cause of autism/diabetes and not just an association, then nobody in the countries where they drink milk from the A2 cows would have autism/diabetes.

Sound reasonable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an association study, which is the same kind of study Ancel Keys used to convince trusting physicians and millions of Americans that animal fats clogged our arteries. Association (also called correlation) studies must always be interpreted with extreme caution. As Uffe Ravnskoff points out in his book The Cholesterol Myth, correlation does not imply causation and he shows graphs of the correlations between TV ownership and the rates of death from heart attack. Do TV sets cause heart attacks? Unlikely, unless you watch too many Daily Show reruns. More likely people who don&#8217;t own TVs are more active, healthier, and therefore less likely to get heart attacks and this creates a correlation without causation.</p>
<p>The bovine genetics and casein subtypes in the different breeds also co-exists with numerous other differences. We know the Holsteins are the breed of choice for industrial farmers because they produce more milk, though of lower quality, and these animals tend to be grain fed rather than grass fed and raised in deplorabile conditions, injected with hormones, and on and on. </p>
<p>A more likely causative explanation is the fact that A1 casein types are consumed primarily by Americans and A2 primarily by people living in countries with lower rates of autism.</p>
<p>I also did look at the genetics, and the difference results in a casein protein that is nearly identical except for a shift in a single amino acid, if memory serves, which is probably a natural variation. Goat milk protein differs by more than a single amino acid, soit seems to me it makes little intuitive sense to start blaming this kind of natural variation for an epidemic. </p>
<p>And a final point: If A1 were the cause of autism/diabetes and not just an association, then nobody in the countries where they drink milk from the A2 cows would have autism/diabetes.</p>
<p>Sound reasonable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://drcate.com/diabetes/comment-page-1/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drcate.com/?p=126#comment-885</guid>
		<description>Hi Dr.Cate,

I found a link (http://thebovine.wordpress.com/2008/10/06/beta-casein-a1-and-a2-in-milk-health/) describing A1 beta-casein and A2 beta-casein that is now linking the A1 casien causing type 1 diabetes in children along with autism and heart disease. The study is basically saying that heritage bovine breeds like the ones they have in India, France, Japan ect. don&#039;t carry the A1 gene like the cows we have here in America and because human milk is of the A2 protien type that&#039;s the type of protien in milk we should be getting. Thus they recommend A2 milk protien like goat and sheep&#039;s milk. I would love to get your take on this study as you do a great job at weeding out the faulty studies! Thank so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dr.Cate,</p>
<p>I found a link (<a href="http://thebovine.wordpress.com/2008/10/06/beta-casein-a1-and-a2-in-milk-health/" rel="nofollow">http://thebovine.wordpress.com/2008/10/06/beta-casein-a1-and-a2-in-milk-health/</a>) describing A1 beta-casein and A2 beta-casein that is now linking the A1 casien causing type 1 diabetes in children along with autism and heart disease. The study is basically saying that heritage bovine breeds like the ones they have in India, France, Japan ect. don&#8217;t carry the A1 gene like the cows we have here in America and because human milk is of the A2 protien type that&#8217;s the type of protien in milk we should be getting. Thus they recommend A2 milk protien like goat and sheep&#8217;s milk. I would love to get your take on this study as you do a great job at weeding out the faulty studies! Thank so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

